<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Quick Backups With Microsoft SyncToy</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.techtraction.com/2008/06/16/quick-backups-with-microsoft-synctoy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.techtraction.com/2008/06/16/quick-backups-with-microsoft-synctoy/</link>
	<description>Personal commentary on technology with a sprinkling of tech-tips and how-to articles</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 01:36:14 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Bret</title>
		<link>http://www.techtraction.com/2008/06/16/quick-backups-with-microsoft-synctoy/comment-page-1/#comment-3900</link>
		<dc:creator>Bret</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 20:06:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techtraction.com/2008/06/16/quick-backups-with-microsoft-synctoy/#comment-3900</guid>
		<description>Hi Dan,

No I don&#039;t believe SyncToy can sync at the bit level. I believe it is an all or nothing file operation. If the file changed, then the new one is allowed to over write the old one.

Also, I agree, I&#039;d like to see SyncToy integrated with a CVS like tool.

Thanks for the comment</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dan,</p>
<p>No I don&#8217;t believe SyncToy can sync at the bit level. I believe it is an all or nothing file operation. If the file changed, then the new one is allowed to over write the old one.</p>
<p>Also, I agree, I&#8217;d like to see SyncToy integrated with a CVS like tool.</p>
<p>Thanks for the comment</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://www.techtraction.com/2008/06/16/quick-backups-with-microsoft-synctoy/comment-page-1/#comment-3898</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 14:42:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.techtraction.com/2008/06/16/quick-backups-with-microsoft-synctoy/#comment-3898</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve used a laptop as my main work computer for 15 years.

I&#039;ve watched Microsoft&#039;s sync capability improve and become incrementally more transparent since the Briefcase in Win 3.x?   The &quot;make available offline&quot; feature of XP seems darn good.

It&#039;s no surprise Sync Toy is good, too. I&#039;ll have to try it out.

Improvements I want to see:

Sync performance improvements using Groove technology -  only sync the bits that have changed, not whole files which might be huge.  Does Sync Toy do this?

Collaboration features:  Syncing on a shared drive is a form of collaboration, but smoother conflict management and revision control (and comments) would be a natural extension.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve used a laptop as my main work computer for 15 years.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve watched Microsoft&#8217;s sync capability improve and become incrementally more transparent since the Briefcase in Win 3.x?   The &#8220;make available offline&#8221; feature of XP seems darn good.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s no surprise Sync Toy is good, too. I&#8217;ll have to try it out.</p>
<p>Improvements I want to see:</p>
<p>Sync performance improvements using Groove technology &#8211;  only sync the bits that have changed, not whole files which might be huge.  Does Sync Toy do this?</p>
<p>Collaboration features:  Syncing on a shared drive is a form of collaboration, but smoother conflict management and revision control (and comments) would be a natural extension.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Dynamic Page Served (once) in 0.562 seconds -->
